What best describes the relationship of 'Expected Outcomes' to 'Actual Outcomes' in testing?

The relationship between 'Expected Outcomes' and 'Actual Outcomes' in testing is best described by how they allow for performance comparison. Expected Outcomes represent the goals or benchmarks that are anticipated prior to the initiation of a project or task. These are typically based on design specifications, requirements, or stakeholder expectations. Actual Outcomes, on the other hand, refer to the results that are achieved after the project or task has been completed.

When comparing these two sets of outcomes, one can assess how well the project met its objectives. This comparison provides valuable insights into project efficiency, effectiveness, and overall performance. It can identify areas where the project did well and where improvements may be needed, ultimately contributing to better project management and execution in the future. This comparison serves as a critical evaluation tool for stakeholders and project managers alike.

In contrast, while terms like project phases, synonymity in meaning, and project success are relevant concepts in their own contexts, they do not focus specifically on the performance comparison that is essential in evaluating outcomes. Celebrating or identifying the gap between what was expected versus what was actually realized is a cornerstone of performance analysis in any testing scenario.